Use cases
Tailored for how developers, land agents, and planning consultants work.
Developers
- Hours spent checking council and EA sites per lead
- Inconsistent formats across different areas
- Unclear which constraints are deal-breakers
- One consistent pack in minutes
- Red/amber/green flags for quick triage
- Clear sources so you can verify before committing
Example workflow
Receive a lead → run postcode through SiteSift → review constraints and AI commentary → decide: deep dive, park, or pass.
Flood Zone 1. No listed buildings on site. Conservation area 200m south — check setting impact. Green belt: No.
Land agents
- Manual compilation of constraints for each client pack
- Clients want to see sources
- Time spent on early-stage sites that don't progress
- Professional, citation-backed pack for every site
- Share link or PDF — clients can verify sources
- Screen more sites without scaling headcount
Example workflow
New instruction → generate report → attach to client briefing. Use branded PDFs so every pack carries your branding.
Key constraints: EA Flood Map (Zone 1). Historic England — no listed within 50m. Local plan: residential allocation.
Planning consultants
- Repeated data gathering for initial site assessment
- Need a consistent starting point before site visit
- Client expects quick view on viability
- Structured facts layer as your starting point
- AI commentary as a prompt, not a replacement
- More time for analysis, less for data collation
Example workflow
Client sends site → generate report → use as baseline. Add your expert layer: policy interpretation, precedent, and recommendation.
Summary: Low flood risk. Heritage — conservation area, listed proximity. Recommend heritage statement and pre-app.